This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Giving is motivated by social emotion. Because giving doesn’t come just from motivation. It comes from the intersection of motivation and cost. Motivation must overcome the cost barrier. Giving results from the intersection of motivation and cost. Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially.
Participants each get money. They are motivational. It actually reduces the charitable behavior.[23] 24] When giving appears motivated by benefits, it loses its value as a signal. Public recognition motivates charitable giving in experiments.); It also opens the possibility for indirect reciprocity. Metcalfe, R.,
Participants each get money. They are motivational. It actually reduces the charitable behavior.[23] 24] When giving appears motivated by benefits, it loses its value as a signal. Public recognition motivates charitable giving in experiments.); It also opens the possibility for indirect reciprocity. Metcalfe, R.,
The letters referenced family upbringing as the source motivating generosity. This worked even when participants were randomly assigned and anonymous. Communication and sex effects in a five‐person prisoner’s dilemma game. OrganizationalBehavior and Human Decision Processes, 66 , 192-202; Dawes, R.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 27,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content