Stanford Social Innovation Review
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022
As close observers of the world of family giving, we are convinced this is an historic moment for families and the future of philanthropy as well. What makes this moment perhaps the most notable time in the history of family philanthropy is that it is a time of crucial choices—with huge potential consequences and opportunities.
Stanford Social Innovation Review
NOVEMBER 8, 2023
A Call for Entrepreneurship Many entrepreneurs choose health care as a venue for innovation because it is one of the sectors where one can do well by doing good. However, the majority of entrepreneurship in the health sector has focused on downstream interventions such as therapeutics and health delivery solutions.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
NonProfit Quarterly
OCTOBER 4, 2023
Rural philanthropy, we believe, can make a positive difference. Unfortunately, philanthropy is disproportionately underinvested in many rural areas , and the sector has not yet coalesced around standard rural-focused methods, tools, and models. Until we know for sure, we will learn by doing.
Stanford Social Innovation Review
MARCH 13, 2024
Do lead naming gifts actually stimulate high-level philanthropy from other donors and is that what motivates HNWIs to make such charitable contributions? There are several different ethical frameworks and relating some of their various theoretical concepts to naming gifts offers critical perspectives on philanthropy and its impetuses.
Stanford Social Innovation Review
NOVEMBER 17, 2022
Either we rely on grant and donor funding, or must continually justify to investors and the public that our entrepreneurship is relevant to solving some of the most pressing issues of our time. As Katherine Clayton of Omnivis suggests, we could build on venture philanthropy’s promise to lower barriers and write checks quickly.
NonProfit Quarterly
JUNE 28, 2023
This involves deep collaboration between movement leaders, creatives, and community, as well as with investors, funders, and wealth holders. We must collaborate on ways to work together and co-conspire to build collective power. It takes long-term, non-extractive, reparative investments. We must be deliberate in how we apply pressure.
Stanford Social Innovation Review
AUGUST 14, 2023
It was in this context that the authors began working together: Michelle as initiative director of the BHC Collaborative in Del Norte County and Tribal Lands and Geneva as TCE’s program officer. Of primary importance was the collaborative relationship Wild Rivers Community Foundation formed with The California Endowment.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
131 
Let's personalize your content